Value-added and other buzzwords
 


 Home
 Design Management
 Observations
  
2006
 
Read this: Riding the Flux
You get what you pay for
The challenges of running a business
Design Excursions - Where do they get off?
Design and Innovation
  
2005
 
Developing design as a profession
  
2004
 
Australian design - alive and kicking
Creativity vs formal systems and processes
A Conversation about Design Culture: One Plus One Equals Three
Strategic scenarios for graphic designers
here is the designer...
Looking beyond the title
Things to think about at the beginning of the year
After Graduation: The Real Reality Show
  
2003
 
Play for keeps, not for points
Defining design for clients
Finding a new label
Advertising in Amsterdam
Why are fees so important for designers?
It's time we got respect - linked article
Return on Creative
Linked article - Designers: Time for Change
Marketing Public Relations Tactics and Programs
The business of communication
Why Australian graphic design should be promoted
  
2002
 
A 'Perfect' Exit
Asia, the new West
What is a consulting firm worth?
The world is going virtual
The Iceberg Secret, Revealed
Experience?
Why do I believe in AGDA?
Simplicity!?
Competitive Cycles
Locals vs Globals
Of Next Big Things
Read this: The End of Wacky Names
  
2001
 
Globals vs locals
It's tough finding work right now - why?
Slovene Design
Business as lottery
Questioning Creativity
Brain Food
Be Careful of What You Wish For...
Style vs Design
  
2000
 
The Trick Question
If you do it - charge for it!
Read this!
  
1999
 
Skilling up for the business of design
The role or influence of design
Learn to Unlearn...
The designer's dilemma
Read this
Questions from non-designers
Business models for studios
  
1998
 
The bad old days are back!
Who is buying web studios?
Looking for a business manager?
Things to think about (maybe...)
More on Swedish Design
Heja Sverige
  
1997
 
Labels, Icons and Other Sins
The Invisible Hand?!
Death of the Designer
Strategic Design
Who should manage the client?
What they want...
Clients or projects?
You are not alone
So how're you doin'?
Climbing the ladder
Value-added and other buzzwords
I have seen the future,
Questions, questions...
Big White Boards
I want to be free!
  
1996
 
Competitive advantage for designers
Competitive advantage, Part 2
A Designer's Life
Client base strategy
Designers are special...
It's a funny thing about designers...
Marketing 101
Marketing 102
Networking for Designers
Pricing of Design Services
Retainers and Other Forms of Payment
Things designers take for granted
We all know design is important, but why?
We're here to solve a problem
When you're asked for artwork files

Joining AGDA
Member Services
Contact AGDA
 
FAQ



by Andrew Lam-Po-Tang

Discuss further in the
Member's Forums
Most designers have heard of the term 'value added,' either used by their clients or by their colleagues. It sounds very positive and somehow better than 'really good work.' What does it really mean? For that matter, what does 'pro-active' mean when it comes to a designer's work?

'Value-added' basically means giving the customer more than they usually get. Quite often it can also mean explaining in detail what they have already been getting, so that they can perceive and therefore take advantage of the benefit. Which ever way the value is 'added' is not as important as the fact that it is perceived, understood, used and paid for. Mind you, 'paid for' does not necessarily mean more money, it could just be plain old-fashioned customer loyalty, which in many cases is just as good.

So how does a designer 'add value'? Firstly through design, secondly through customer service, thirdly through strategic vision. Design adds value to the product or service, whereas the other two add value to the client directly.

Design allows a client to position their product/service as: a. something worth more than what it costs to make; and b. distinct from other competing products/services.

Customer service allows the client be a little more confident when commissioning and managing design work, thereby letting them spend more of their precious time and energy on the other hundred issues they are currently facing.

Strategic vision actually assists the client directly in their job, by providing additional information about markets and competitors they may otherwise not have access to. The 'additional information' may not immediately strike the designer as valuable to the client, but that's where business skills and acumen kick in - a designer takes analysis of competitor image positioning for granted, whereas aclient may not have the visual language skills to do the same. So in that particular case, taking the time to explain how the competitors' visual languages and designs support their market position is highly valuable.

Most designers understand the importance of design, and even the importance of the other elements. Doing something about it is 'pro-active.' Not waiting until you're asked is being pro-active. Bringing interesting and revelant items and topics to the client's attention (even if they haven't asked for them) is being pro-active.

I know it is sometimes hard not to sneer when you hear business jargon, but I guess I have always assumed that each field of activity will have its own language (god knows designers do!) and that it is polite to at least attempt to learn the basics. It is very Australian to be laconic and unaffected, in both language and actions, but I think you can these admirable qualities too far when you are trying to bridge the gap between two worlds.

Go ahead and call a spade a spade, but only after you have proven to your listener that you have really understood what they mean by 'a manual earth-moving device.'


Your Email Address    
Your Name  
   

Return to Observations

AGDA Members: Discuss this article in AGDA's Business Forum.


The views expressed this article are not necessarily those of AGDA. Please note that the information in this article is the opinion of the author only. I can therefore accept no responsibility for actions taken on the basis of this information. Copyright Andrew Lam-Po-Tang (andrew@lam-po-tangcom), 1998-2008. Permission is granted to freely copy this document in electronic form, or to print, for personal use. Reprinting for non-personal use will require the express permission of the author (which I will generally be very happy to give).