The business of communication
 


 Home
 Design Management
 Observations
  
2006
 
Read this: Riding the Flux
You get what you pay for
The challenges of running a business
Design Excursions - Where do they get off?
Design and Innovation
  
2005
 
Developing design as a profession
  
2004
 
Australian design - alive and kicking
Creativity vs formal systems and processes
A Conversation about Design Culture: One Plus One Equals Three
Strategic scenarios for graphic designers
here is the designer...
Looking beyond the title
Things to think about at the beginning of the year
After Graduation: The Real Reality Show
  
2003
 
Play for keeps, not for points
Defining design for clients
Finding a new label
Advertising in Amsterdam
Why are fees so important for designers?
It's time we got respect - linked article
Return on Creative
Linked article - Designers: Time for Change
Marketing Public Relations Tactics and Programs
The business of communication
Why Australian graphic design should be promoted
  
2002
 
A 'Perfect' Exit
Asia, the new West
What is a consulting firm worth?
The world is going virtual
The Iceberg Secret, Revealed
Experience?
Why do I believe in AGDA?
Simplicity!?
Competitive Cycles
Locals vs Globals
Of Next Big Things
Read this: The End of Wacky Names
  
2001
 
Globals vs locals
It's tough finding work right now - why?
Slovene Design
Business as lottery
Questioning Creativity
Brain Food
Be Careful of What You Wish For...
Style vs Design
  
2000
 
The Trick Question
If you do it - charge for it!
Read this!
  
1999
 
Skilling up for the business of design
The role or influence of design
Learn to Unlearn...
The designer's dilemma
Read this
Questions from non-designers
Business models for studios
  
1998
 
The bad old days are back!
Who is buying web studios?
Looking for a business manager?
Things to think about (maybe...)
More on Swedish Design
Heja Sverige
  
1997
 
Labels, Icons and Other Sins
The Invisible Hand?!
Death of the Designer
Strategic Design
Who should manage the client?
What they want...
Clients or projects?
You are not alone
So how're you doin'?
Climbing the ladder
Value-added and other buzzwords
I have seen the future,
Questions, questions...
Big White Boards
I want to be free!
  
1996
 
Competitive advantage for designers
Competitive advantage, Part 2
A Designer's Life
Client base strategy
Designers are special...
It's a funny thing about designers...
Marketing 101
Marketing 102
Networking for Designers
Pricing of Design Services
Retainers and Other Forms of Payment
Things designers take for granted
We all know design is important, but why?
We're here to solve a problem
When you're asked for artwork files

Joining AGDA
Member Services
Contact AGDA
 
FAQ



by Kate Nelson

Discuss further in the
Member's Forums
In my first article, I made the case for Why Australian graphic design should be promoted. Celebrating graphic design is not only playing a part in further developing our sophisticated, educated and civilised society - it has documented positive business outcomes; improving the bottom line for design businesses.

While many designers are consumed with interpreting and investing energy into their clients' brands - are they as vigilant when it comes to their own brand?

Ex-pat designer Ryan Guppy (former senior designer of Fabio Ongarato Design) said, "My local heroes have shifted since I entered the industry ten years ago. Originally my role models were those designers with great visual propositions, now I look to those who have not only mastered inspiring interpretations, but those who are also respected business leaders."

The question needs to be considered - do enough studios in Australia operate as business leaders, or are they hamstrung by a single focus on their craft and a lack of business knowledge?

According to The Precinct Melbourne's Ty Bukewitsch, "The history of Australia's design houses has often been to 'buy into the personality' of the principal. Building a studio based on an individual rather than a team has long-term business limitations."

"Today there is a move to focus on the 'we', or the sum of the individuals that make up a studio's brand. By moving away from a 'me' mentality, there is greater room to more honestly reflect your clients personality, as opposed to buying the specific style of a studio."

"Furthermore, drawing on the collective strength of a team, rather than an individual, minimises the risk of a studio loosing its focus once its principal has retired," concluded Bukewitsch.

So what are the implications for a studio that wants to move from marketing 'me' to marketing the team, as articulated by Bukewitsch

Graphic designers know only too well the importance of a company's identity. A company's brand equity is the crux of all activity, from marketing and a visual identity through to the overall business plan. It can be an asset with significant financial worth.

A professional and successful business not only takes into consideration how it meets its clients' expectations (services) and continually develops its infrastructure (accommodation, IT, etc), it also relies on constant monitoring of its organisational health (succession plans, training and development). Equally as important are operational considerations (mergers and acquisitions, legal, finances), and marketing and public relations (communicating key messages about your services to target audiences) that reflect the company's business plan.

With public relations and marketing as significant business tools, design studios need to look seriously at how they celebrate triumphs, increase their profiles locally and internationally, and communicate the relevance and importance of their craft outside their own community. That is, how they position their brand beyond its visual identity.

Marketing public relations (MPR) is the logical planning of activities and initiatives that communicate key messages to target audiences, to achieve business goals, most often including revenue generation. There is skill in determining what your key messages are, and how to communicate them for a desired attitudinal change or call to action. However, common sense - which is not always so common - is the attribute you need for planning MPR activity in a logical fashion, ensuring that it is effective rather than ego-massaging.

To date the industry has relied largely on tactics such as word of mouth (by studio principals and by clients), the usual collateral (that designers are specialists in producing), and the strength of the industry voice based on industry associations' awards and conferences.

In comparison to our international cousins we can only lament: where are the beautifully crafted collector books that showcase Australia's best, the magazines to rival UK Design Week, and associations boasting memberships that reflect a committed industry? Why are the majority of studios slow to announce to the media their client wins, involvement in international projects, and invitations to speak at international forums? Sponsored events that engage mutual target markets? The use of cause related marketing?

With the majority of studios being small businesses we could forgive their principals for being time poor and perhaps struggling to be the 'master of all trades'. But if Australian design is to be taken seriously as a business tool for its clients, then studios themselves must keep abreast of modern business practices. At the very least, simple marketing, public relations and communication activity can aid in business development and retention of staff.


Kate Nelson is a senior consultant with Creative Manoeuvres. She is currently writing a series of articles for AGDA Pages surrounding design and public relations. Next article: MPR tactics and programs (media, stakeholder relations, sponsorship, events, promotions/publicity)

Contact: kate@manoeuvres.com.au 03 9341 7171


Your Email Address    
Your Name  
   

Return to Observations

AGDA Members: Discuss this article in AGDA's Business Forum.


The views expressed this article are not necessarily those of AGDA. Please note that the information in this article is the opinion of the author only. I can therefore accept no responsibility for actions taken on the basis of this information. Copyright Andrew Lam-Po-Tang (andrew@lam-po-tangcom), 1998-2008. Permission is granted to freely copy this document in electronic form, or to print, for personal use. Reprinting for non-personal use will require the express permission of the author (which I will generally be very happy to give).