The bad old days are back!
 


 Home
 Design Management
 Observations
  
2006
 
Read this: Riding the Flux
You get what you pay for
The challenges of running a business
Design Excursions - Where do they get off?
Design and Innovation
  
2005
 
Developing design as a profession
  
2004
 
Australian design - alive and kicking
Creativity vs formal systems and processes
A Conversation about Design Culture: One Plus One Equals Three
Strategic scenarios for graphic designers
here is the designer...
Looking beyond the title
Things to think about at the beginning of the year
After Graduation: The Real Reality Show
  
2003
 
Play for keeps, not for points
Defining design for clients
Finding a new label
Advertising in Amsterdam
Why are fees so important for designers?
It's time we got respect - linked article
Return on Creative
Linked article - Designers: Time for Change
Marketing Public Relations Tactics and Programs
The business of communication
Why Australian graphic design should be promoted
  
2002
 
A 'Perfect' Exit
Asia, the new West
What is a consulting firm worth?
The world is going virtual
The Iceberg Secret, Revealed
Experience?
Why do I believe in AGDA?
Simplicity!?
Competitive Cycles
Locals vs Globals
Of Next Big Things
Read this: The End of Wacky Names
  
2001
 
Globals vs locals
It's tough finding work right now - why?
Slovene Design
Business as lottery
Questioning Creativity
Brain Food
Be Careful of What You Wish For...
Style vs Design
  
2000
 
The Trick Question
If you do it - charge for it!
Read this!
  
1999
 
Skilling up for the business of design
The role or influence of design
Learn to Unlearn...
The designer's dilemma
Read this
Questions from non-designers
Business models for studios
  
1998
 
The bad old days are back!
Who is buying web studios?
Looking for a business manager?
Things to think about (maybe...)
More on Swedish Design
Heja Sverige
  
1997
 
Labels, Icons and Other Sins
The Invisible Hand?!
Death of the Designer
Strategic Design
Who should manage the client?
What they want...
Clients or projects?
You are not alone
So how're you doin'?
Climbing the ladder
Value-added and other buzzwords
I have seen the future,
Questions, questions...
Big White Boards
I want to be free!
  
1996
 
Competitive advantage for designers
Competitive advantage, Part 2
A Designer's Life
Client base strategy
Designers are special...
It's a funny thing about designers...
Marketing 101
Marketing 102
Networking for Designers
Pricing of Design Services
Retainers and Other Forms of Payment
Things designers take for granted
We all know design is important, but why?
We're here to solve a problem
When you're asked for artwork files

Joining AGDA
Member Services
Contact AGDA
 
FAQ



by Andrew Lam-Po-Tang

Discuss further in the
Member's Forums
Excerpt from a weekly e-mail newsletter on software that I subscribe to (http://www.download.com).
LAYOUT-O-MATIC
File size: 2.8MB
License: shareware ($10)
Minimum requirements: Windows 95/NT

Advances in media technology have made it possible for you to introduce your thoughts to millions at once--yet two problems remain. First of all, the most innovative communication tools are so complex that it's easy to spend more time wrestling with the tools than actually coming up with the resulting product. The second problem is the sheer arrogance of a blank page: it just sits there, challenging you to come up with something. In designing Web pages, that "something" means both layout and content. Layout-o-Matic (not by Ronco) boosts you over the layout wall by helping you quickly create your layout of choice, ready to be filled with your choice content. Don't get stuck in the process of designing your paper; lay your creative talents on the line and get straight to the content. Mmm, now that's good layout:

Back in the "good old days," graphic designers barely knew what hit them when Aldus brought out PageMaker* for the Mac, which was then quickly followed by Ventura (for Wintel), Quark Xpress and Framemaker (Wintel). There were a few other page layout programs that came and went, but those were the biggies at the time. At the time, every one laughed at how primitive the tools were (ie. no real typographic control, etc.) but it only took about five years for the entire global graphic design industry to migrate onto these tools - nowadays it's only crusty old designers (and young ones with retro pretensions) that crap on about designing without this stuff.

Oh yeah, and the bit that was REALLY important was the way that these programs opened the floodgates of desktop publishing bureaus and inhouse departments, followed shortly by a tidal wave of enthusiastic home amateurs. Now everyone's a graphic designer, or at least the major discount computer stores would like you to think so. And it is starting to happen all over again with web design...

Two sentences in LAYOUT-O-MATIC.'s selling pitch stand out in particular:

"the sheer arrogance of a blank page: it just sits there, challenging you to come up with something"

"Don't get stuck in the process of designing your paper; lay your creative talents on the line and get straight to the content."

Clever isn't it - the way that the user is encouraged to get indignant about creativity and design. Hey, if we can't make the responsibility go away, let's malign it and automate it instead!

Of course, things aren't quite the same this time around: the web was FIRST populated by amateurs (unlike print design) and most major clients have worked out that amateur-land doesn't cut it for commercial websites.

However, that leaves a lot of smaller companies (ie. 90% of the companies in Australia) who would be in the dark about how to tell a good designer from a crap one. So here we go again - back out on the road trying to convince a client that someone not unlike there 14 yr whizzkid child is not really comparable to a pro - isn't it neat how some challenges never really go away, no matter how many times you try?

What are you going say to your next web design prospect?


Feedback by Emily Simoni  Tuesday, 9 December 2003
"sounds like what i have been saying for the last two year. Due to looking back at my life and WHY i have done things the way i have."
 


Your Email Address    
Your Name  
   

Return to Observations

AGDA Members: Discuss this article in AGDA's Business Forum.


The views expressed this article are not necessarily those of AGDA. Please note that the information in this article is the opinion of the author only. I can therefore accept no responsibility for actions taken on the basis of this information. Copyright Andrew Lam-Po-Tang (andrew@lam-po-tangcom), 1998-2008. Permission is granted to freely copy this document in electronic form, or to print, for personal use. Reprinting for non-personal use will require the express permission of the author (which I will generally be very happy to give).